Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS? - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
Date
Msg-id 200404200202.i3K22d610749@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?  (L J Bayuk <ljb220@mindspring.com>)
List pgsql-interfaces
L J Bayuk wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > ...
> > OK, Marc has removed libpgtcl.  I just removed the docs for them.
> > 
> > Can someone comment on pgtclsh?  The README says:
> >...
> > 
> > Do we need to move that over to gborg?  If so, you can pull it out of
> > 7.4 CVS.
> > 
> > Anyone?
> 
> Already discussed:
>   http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2004-02/msg00076.php
> and
>   http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2004-02/msg00078.php

Great.  Thanks you.

I heard it wasn't needed, but couldn't remember if that was current
information or something old.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: L J Bayuk
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
Next
From: Rich Cullingford
Date:
Subject: Passing NEW to functions inside a trigger function...