Re: pg_restore ignore error patch - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_restore ignore error patch
Date
Msg-id 200404192215.i3JMFVH25061@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_restore ignore error patch  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Responses Re: pg_restore ignore error patch
List pgsql-patches
Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> Dear patchers,
>
> please find a small patch submission so that "pg_restore" ignores some sql
> errors.
>
> The implementation seems quite reasonnable to me, but pg-gods may have a
> different opinion. Two fields are added to the ArchiveHandler to trigger
> the behavior. A count summary of ignored sql errors is printed at the end
> of the restoration.
>
> I did not fixed the "set session auth" attempt as option "-O" can already
> be used to avoid it.
>
> It validates for me, but it seems that pg_dump/pg_restore is just *NOT*
> tested at all in the validation:-(. So at least I tested it.
>
> My tests suggest that a feature of pg_restore is that it is only expected
> to work with its own server. Indeed, it generates some new syntax, such as
> $$ quoting, which is not compatible with older servers. This fact does not
> seem to appear in the documentation.

I looked over the patch and it seems to continue on pg_restore errors by
default.  That isn't good.  By default, any error should make it exit
loudly.

I can see value in having a flag that allows pg_restore to continue on
errors, particularly because only pg_restore can read binary dumps.  Do
folks get pg_restor failures frequently?  I sure hope not.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: minor readme patch for pg_autovacuum
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore ignore error patch