Re: Filesystem vs. Postgres for images - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Holger Klawitter
Subject Re: Filesystem vs. Postgres for images
Date
Msg-id 200404131256.15356.lists@klawitter.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Filesystem vs. Postgres for images  ("Development - multi.art.studio" <dev.null@multiartstudio.com>)
List pgsql-general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

> imho other filesystems like reiser have some version-problems ;)

Oh please. Reiser is as unstable as postgres is slow - in other words, both
have to suffer prejudice which used to be true loooong ago. ;-)

In cases of large directories ext2/3 perform extremely bad (as in the original
post) So this guy will be better off with anything but ext2/3. That's why I
switched from ext2 to reiser ~2 years ago (without any problems since).

Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards
    Holger Klawitter
- --
lists <at> klawitter <dot> de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAe8dP1Xdt0HKSwgYRAkLqAJ4vmqkDGkFYDL67aPMAK6qGAavEQgCfekvV
JCht52XAoXE8DrbXX24B8gc=
=XjOz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Holger Klawitter
Date:
Subject: verifying unicode locale support
Next
From: Cott Lang
Date:
Subject: Re: Filesystem vs. Postgres for images