Am Freitag, 9. April 2004 22:32 schrieb G. Brannon Smith:
> Answering my own post. I went ahead and bit the bullent and dumped the
> whole thing over to ENCODING = 'UNICODE'. Wasn't nearly as painful as I
> thought it would be... although I guess the DB has now effectively
> doubled in size.
Isn't Unicode mostly the same size in byte as long as most charcters are
ascii? So, are you sure your DB size doubles? in my understanding of unicode,
size should be almost the same in your case.
kind regards,
janning
