Re: pg_ctl porting - Mailing list pgsql-hackers-win32

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_ctl porting
Date
Msg-id 200404091445.i39EjJ122253@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_ctl porting  (Claudio Natoli <claudio.natoli@memetrics.com>)
Responses Re: pg_ctl porting  (Ronald Kuczek <kuczek@kuczek.pl>)
List pgsql-hackers-win32
Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
>
> > Idea to start postmaster as new console thread is - IMO all except
> > productive solution.
>
> I agree, I'd much rather see the Win32 service functions directly integrated
> with the postmaster.
>
> Perhaps it was not clear from the code I sent you, however that is exactly
> what I had intended (ie. *not* a rewrite of pg_ctl).

FYI, we will rewrite pg_ctl in C anyway in case someone wants to control
PostgreSQL from a script.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date:

Previous
From: "Richard Sydney-Smith"
Date:
Subject: Integrated Backup Service?
Next
From: Ronald Kuczek
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_ctl porting