Re: using index on comparison with bit-operation? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: using index on comparison with bit-operation?
Date
Msg-id 200404082145.i38LjEm22007@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to using index on comparison with bit-operation?  (geek_1981@yahoo.de (Michael Groth))
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Groth wrote:
> hi,
> 
> is it possible to use an index on the expression '(table_1.field &
> table_2.field)::int > 0' ?
> 
> here's the whole query:
> 
> SELECT 
>     COUNT(*)
> FROM
>     users AS users
> JOIN
>     search_profile AS search_profile ON
> (search_profile.bin_matching_field_0 &
> users.bin_matching_field_0)::int > 0
> WHERE
>     users.id = 190

No, there is no way to use an index because the columns are in different
tables.  It is like saying:
tab1.col1 = tab2.col2

Now, you want them both to be true, so it is really:
tab1.col1 AND tab2.col2

and that can be indexed by separate indexes on col1 and col2.  Of
course, if many rows are true, the index will not be used because it is
faster to just look at all the rows with a sequential scan.


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: using index on comparison with bit-operation?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: using index on comparison with bit-operation?