Re: good pc but bad performance,why? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: good pc but bad performance,why?
Date
Msg-id 200404080133.i381XYu13325@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: good pc but bad performance,why?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: good pc but bad performance,why?
List pgsql-performance
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > scott.marlowe wrote:
> >>> There is no real need (or benefit) from having the database on a
> >>> journalled filesystem - the journalling is only trying to give similar
> >>> sorts of guarantees to what the fsync in PostgreSQL is doing.
> >>
> >> Is this true?  I was under the impression that without at least meta-data
> >> journaling postgresql could still be corrupted by power failure.
>
> > It is false.  ext2 isn't crash-safe, and PostgreSQL needs an intact file
> > system for WAL recovery.
>
> But it should be okay to set the filesystem to journal only its own
> metadata.  There's no need for it to journal file contents.

Can you set ext2 to journal metadata?  I didn't know it could do that.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: good pc but bad performance,why?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: good pc but bad performance,why?