Re: Sequential Scan Index Bug - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Stephan Szabo
Subject Re: Sequential Scan Index Bug
Date
Msg-id 20040407095413.Q69347@megazone.bigpanda.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Sequential Scan Index Bug  ("Gabriel Weinberg" <yegg@alum.mit.edu>)
Responses Re: Sequential Scan Index Bug  ("Gabriel Weinberg" <yegg@alum.mit.edu>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Gabriel Weinberg wrote:

> Presumably, but that is not what I was doing.

I was responding to the part that was: "I would expect it to throw an
error immediately, instead of scanning the table for a value of a
different type." If say intcol = 4.345 is an error, is intcol = 4.0 an
error as well given that 4.345 and 4.0 are presumably the same type?  I'm
not sure what error you would expect.

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: Sequential Scan Index Bug
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: Sequential Scan Index Bug