Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/datatype.sgml - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/datatype.sgml
Date
Msg-id 200403302152.i2ULqG320341@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/datatype.sgml  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Added to TODO:

   * Add GUC variable to allow output of interval values in ISO8601 format


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Ron Mayer <ron@cheapcomplexdevices.com> writes:
> >   Would formatting functions for intervals such as...
> >    to_iso8601basic_char(interval)  -- return ISO-8601 basic fmt interval
> >    to_iso8601basic_char(timestamp) -- return ISO-8601 basic fmt date/time
> >   would be better than a new GUC variable?
>
> I could see arguments for both --- in the timestamp world we have
> DateStyle to control the default output format, plus to_char when you
> want something different.  I'd suggest continuing with your plan of
> providing GUC control over the default interval format (just use a
> separate GUC variable, please, for orthogonality).  If you want to add
> an explicit formatting function later, you can do that too.
>
> BTW, I do not recall exactly why Karel wants to deprecate
> to_char(interval), but I don't think it's because of any fundamental
> objection to the notion of a formatting function.  I think it was
> because the present definition is badly designed and needs to be
> replaced with a different API.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Karel Zak
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Dates BC.
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Some Documentation Changes