On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 12:21:07AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
[...]
> The similar changes that remove the ability to recognize failures
> during AbortTransaction are even worse, because cleanup after a failed
> transaction is exactly where you would most expect software bugs to
> pop up.
Hey, I was just adding the code back when I noticed that
AbortTransaction() sets the TRANS_ABORT state just _before_ doing it's
work, not after. And all functions are executed with interrupts held
(HOLD_INTERRUPTS / RELEASE_INTERRUPTS). So the comments I made earlier
are irrelevant.
After all this, I still think the TRANS state is unnecesary. I will add
checks in the low level routines so they see what TBLOCK state they are
called in, which should be enough to keep the current functionality
and robustness.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"A wizard is never late, Frodo Baggins, nor is he early.
He arrives precisely when he means to." (Gandalf, en LoTR FoTR)
