Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Matthew T. O'Connor
Subject Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)
Date
Msg-id 200403242313.40049.matthew@zeut.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)  (Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>)
Responses Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 06:03 pm, Dustin Sallings wrote:
>     There's not a lot of GUI in arch, but star-merge is fairly incredible.
>   This is how tla (the main arch implementation) itself is developed.
> Lots of branches in lots of archives by lots of people.

I would guess that better merging might be a real motivation for people.  If a 
patch that takes a month to develop can still apply cleanly despite 
significant code drift in the interrem, I could see that as a real motivating 
factor.


Matthew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Email addresses on developer bios site
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] unicode error and problem