Re: pg_advisor schema proof of concept - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Richard Huxton
Subject Re: pg_advisor schema proof of concept
Date
Msg-id 200403241737.40735.dev@archonet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_advisor schema proof of concept  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_advisor schema proof of concept  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 15:52, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >> If plpgsql works OK, I say stick with it.
> >
> > Hmmm. I'm not very happy with plpgsql,
>
> I don't know where you are planning on going with this.  If it's only to
> be a contrib tool, it's okay to depend on plpgsql.  But we couldn't
> incorporate it into the base system because plpgsql isn't part of the
> base system.

So Tom, are you suggesting:1. A core in the base distribution (C / SQL)2. command-line tool in the base distro
(pg_advisor)3.more open project (gborg?) to let people design/add tests, some of which 
 
will eventually end up in the standard set in the base distro.

--  Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Log rotation
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: My chat addresses