On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 01:16:51PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I agree a renaming of list functions is good. If we had kept the
> original Berkeley code as-is, we would have a lot fewer developers
> today. :-) Making drastic cleanups is often worthwile. I write
> backend code and still can't remember which list function does what, so
> clearer naming would help me a lot, and I am sure others too.
Maybe I already ask, is there any coding style recommendation for _new_written things?
I agree with Bruce. The list functions and a lot of other functionscan be candidates for rename. I read Mono
docs last night andit's perfect if they can write to docs about functions names:"mono_<type>_<action>".
I think sometime are people too much focus on the shortest way totarget and forgot that with code work others
people and not CPU only.(sorry of this pontification:-)
Karel
-- Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/
