Tom Lane wrote:
> Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes:
> > I really, really, really want to see threads enabled for libpq for this
> > platform, especially since SCO will be distributing it at some point in
> > time.
>
> I think very few of the folks on this list will see that as a reason
> why they should expend any effort; more likely the opposite.
>
> If you can fix it yourself in a reasonably non-intrusive way, we'll take
> the patch ... that's about the extent of the cooperation you can expect.
My big problem is that Larry doesn't have realistic balance in
determining how we are to spend our time. Basically, if threading isn't
working in CVS for his platform, it is a crisis, and he thinks it should
be a crisis for us too, and will complain continuously until it is
fixed. (This has been the pattern in the past.)
I have no desire to work that way. I, and Tom (I think) suggested that
we wait to see what other platforms need this kind of fix before
deciding on a solution. However, Larry is obviously not satisfied with
that, so he is complaining. Last I looked, I was here to work for the
community, based on the community priorities, not Larry's.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
