Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
Date
Msg-id 20040315212110.GE2921@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:37:58AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> This also brings up the thought that if we do want to use pgfoundry.org,
> we'd better register pgfoundry.net and pgfoundry.com before someone
> else does.

And .info?  And .biz?  And whatever other unrestricted nonsense
things there are out there?  (I know my employers would dearly love
everyone who has a name they want to protect to register it in every
registry on earth, but I have a feeling that if the industry gets its
way, that's going to become impractical soon.)

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
The plural of anecdote is not data.    --Roger Brinner


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL write of full pages
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: listening addresses