Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeroen T. Vermeulen
Subject Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
Date
Msg-id 20040312155054.GV39391@xs4all.nl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:37:58AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Well, if you want to think along those lines, I believe that we (PGDG)
> currently hold these domain names:

[...]

>     postgres.org

This is the one I was silently rooting for, but figured was too good to
be true.


> You could make a case that postgres.org for the projects would be the
> perfect complement to postgresql.org for the core.

Still _slightly_ confusing, but I think the plain and simple idea of a
prominent banner was mentioned.  We can have them both ways to avoid all
confusion.  I say go for it!


Jeroen


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs.
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org