On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:37:58AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Well, if you want to think along those lines, I believe that we (PGDG)
> currently hold these domain names:
[...]
> postgres.org
This is the one I was silently rooting for, but figured was too good to
be true.
> You could make a case that postgres.org for the projects would be the
> perfect complement to postgresql.org for the core.
Still _slightly_ confusing, but I think the plain and simple idea of a
prominent banner was mentioned. We can have them both ways to avoid all
confusion. I say go for it!
Jeroen