Re: Comparison of PGSQL and DB2 - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Comparison of PGSQL and DB2
Date
Msg-id 200403111755.39590.josh@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Comparison of PGSQL and DB2  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Responses Re: Comparison of PGSQL and DB2  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Chris,

> >>This is a feature which we do not have because it violates the ANSI SQL
> >>Specification.
>
> Dude - the reason we don't have it is because no-one can be bothered
> coding it...nothing to do with the SQL spec...

?? I'm pretty sure that the SQL spec puts database at the top of the heirarchy
tree, and treats them as inviolate.

Unfortunately, my copy of Date is in storage.   Can someone check this?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Advocacy Volunteer
http://advocacy.postgresql.org/
San Francisco


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: The big MySQL spin
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Comparison of PGSQL and DB2