On Tuesday 09 March 2004 16:53, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Robert,
>
> > Are you planning on running this along with the current website projects
> > (www/techdocs/etc...) or will this be independent?
>
> Independent. Gforge is 90% dynamic content, and as such it won't fit in
> with the mirroring scheme for Portal.
>
even if doesnt fit into the mirroring scheme that doesnt mean it has to be
seperate.... techdocs/advocacy arnt mirrored... just wondering if discussion
on its development would take place here so everyone is in the loop... that
type of thing...
> ie. There was
>
> > previous discussion of a projects.postgresql.net domain to be used for
> > this, is that deprecated?
>
> The guys (Andrew, Marc, etc.) liked www.pgfoundry.org more. Several other
> addresses will be configured to point to this one.
>
hmm...from an advocacy point istm this would be a good place to play up the
postgresql brand, such that it is... but ce la vei i guess
> >Also for theming, shouldn't it use the main
> > postgresql.org css ?
>
> Can't AFAIK, GForge is not xhtml/css-based. Gforge formatting is
> database-centric.
It uses css for sure... just a question of where its going to pull it from...
if they want to be seperate though i guess a different look/feel would be the
way to go. (It's just counter to what people have complained about in the
past with gborg...)
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
