Re: not necessarily a bug... - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Alex J. Avriette
Subject Re: not necessarily a bug...
Date
Msg-id 20040310003331.GU541@posixnap.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to not necessarily a bug...  (Theodore Petrosky <tedpet5@yahoo.com>)
Responses Re: not necessarily a bug...
List pgsql-bugs
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 02:17:23PM -0800, Theodore Petrosky wrote:

> and to my suprise, i was in and able to issue
> commands. what is 'bothering' me is that I was not
> asked for a password. in defence of the system, I was
> on a mac os x box logged in as 'postgres' so my
> current name was postgres.
>
> is this correct behaviour? I was expecting to be
> challenged.

Documentation is your friend, Ted. You need to read the pg_hba.conf
file in your PG_DATA directory, and the documentation which came with
the postgres distribution. Additionally, this really isn't a question
for hackers@.

Alex

--
alex@posixnap.net
Alex J. Avriette, Unix Systems Gladiator
The Emperor Wears No Clothes.
http://www.drugsense.org/wodclock.htm

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Theodore Petrosky
Date:
Subject: not necessarily a bug...
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: initdb could use some lower default settings (trivial patch)