Re: Sigh, 7.3.6 rewrap not right - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Lamar Owen
Subject Re: Sigh, 7.3.6 rewrap not right
Date
Msg-id 200403042242.06225.lowen@pari.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Sigh, 7.3.6 rewrap not right  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Sigh, 7.3.6 rewrap not right  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Sigh, 7.3.6 rewrap not right  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thursday 04 March 2004 10:28 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> There were no code-change differences in this rewrap, so I see no real
> need to change the version number.

> The lesson I'd prefer to see us take away from this is that Marc needs
> to automate his release wrapping process more.  These sorta mistakes
> shouldn't have happened in the first place ...

There are now multiple copies of 7.3.6 out there.  How is a body to know which 
one to use?  On RPMs, as you well now, SOP is to increment the release on any 
change, including a typo.  This way there is no ambiguity.

This is not the first time tarballs have been streamlined.  I'm glad I hadn't 
built any RPMs yet.
-- 
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC  28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Sigh, 7.3.6 rewrap not right
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Sigh, 7.3.6 rewrap not right