Re: [ADMIN] Schema comparisons - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alex J. Avriette
Subject Re: [ADMIN] Schema comparisons
Date
Msg-id 20040229022348.GL8646@posixnap.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [ADMIN] Schema comparisons  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [ADMIN] Schema comparisons  (Tim Larson <tim@keow.org>)
Re: [ADMIN] Schema comparisons  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Re: [ADMIN] Schema comparisons  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 10:39:40AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

> >> Have you tried diffing pg_dump output?  It's not the greatest tool but
> >> it's helpful.
> 
> > Yes, I did.  It was quite cumbersome.  Especially since the OIDs and 
> > TOC entry numbers didn't matchup; and, since those didn't always match, 
> > the order of objects wasn't quite the same either.  So, diff was 
> > throwing a lot of false positives at me.
> 
> Yeah.  CVS-tip pg_dump doesn't show OIDs by default, to make it easier
> to use for purposes like this.  The ordering issue is the bigger problem
> though.  I presume that the object creation history is different in the
> two databases and so pg_dump's habit of sorting by OID isn't helpful.

I recently had to figure out what was different between the "live" schema
and the schema in cvs at work. This was a really painful process, and it
occurred to me that it wouldn't be terribly hard to write a perl program
to do it (I wound up using vim and diff). Is there interest in such a tool?
I could probably have one written within a day or two.

Alex

--
alex@posixnap.net
Alex J. Avriette, Solaris Systems Masseur
http://envy.posixnap.net/~alex/articles/nro-wahhabi.html


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Schema comparisons
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.3.6 for Monday ... still a go?