Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint
Date
Msg-id 200402161544.i1GFiGV22315@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Tom Lane wrote:
> The best idea I've heard so far is the one about sync() followed by
> a bunch of fsync()s.  That seems to be correct, efficient, and dependent
> only on very-long-established Unix semantics.

Agreed.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Gibson
Date:
Subject: Re: dblink - custom datatypes NOW work :)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] dollar quoting