Re: RFC: Security documentation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: RFC: Security documentation
Date
Msg-id 200402151213.59216.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RFC: Security documentation  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wednesday 11 February 2004 12:46, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 11:24:56PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > The problem with this approach, of course, is that large application
> > developers generally like to make the database fairly "passive" and put
> > all business & security logic in the middleware.   I do think it would be
> > useful for them to realize that they are sacrificing a significant
> > portion of their data security by doing so.
>
> Perhaps what would be best is some kind of a 'best practices' guide.
> There's far more that people should consider beyond just quoting
> strings; Josh's example is just one thing.
>
> If written carefully, such a guide could serve both experienced DBAs as
> well as people who are very new to databases, since every database has
> it's own prefered way of doing things.

Was thinking if somene want to write up a series of articles discussing 
security best practices, this might be a good starting point since it would 
require somone to have everything figured out before getting started; you 
could pick a certain section and get specific about it. We have the 
infrastructure on techdocs to publish this, and once started we could use it 
to determine what should or should not be added to the standard docs. 

Robert Treat
-- 
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] dollar quoting
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposed Query Planner TODO items