Tom Lane wrote:
> Given all the work Peter put into GUC (for very good reasons), I was
> a tad astonished to read him proposing to develop a non-GUC mechanism
> for configuring PLs.
I for one was a tad astonished to read that there is already support for
adding variables at run-time, given that we previously rejected that
notion. But the "namespace" idea for variables added by external
modules sounds interesting.
