Re: Postgresql.org search engine. - Mailing list pgsql-www
From | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Postgresql.org search engine. |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20040131015634.M29077@ganymede.hub.org Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Postgresql.org search engine. (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>) |
Responses |
Re: Postgresql.org search engine.
|
List | pgsql-www |
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > Marc and Dave, > > at the same time, could you see how to generating right http headers > (LAST-MODIFIED), so search engines could cache documents and don't waste > server resources . What I still don't understand is if > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-01/msg00745t.php > is static page or dynamic :-? If dynamic I don't see any problem generating > headers, if static - you could always use 'touch' hack to set correct > last modification date to file. Huh? The t.php one above was just to show Dave what the search engines are seeing (ie. minus the search/banner/links, just the message) ... its not part of the system, just a copy of an existing message ... re last-modified time ... what is wrong with it? According to my browser, it is being displayed correctly, or are you still hung up on the fact that it doesn't equal the posting date of the message itself? If that is all it is, I'm planning on trying something this weekend to get that in place, but the last time I tried it didn't work ... again, if you have better software you can recommend then what we are using now to generate the archives (mhonarc), please speak up before I go through the trouble of regenerating everything all over again ... > > Oleg > > On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Dave Page wrote: > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy@postgresql.org] > > > Sent: 30 January 2004 21:02 > > > To: Dave Page > > > Cc: Marc G. Fournier; Oleg Bartunov; josh@agliodbs.com; > > > pgsql-www@postgresql.org > > > Subject: RE: [pgsql-www] Postgresql.org search engine. > > > > > > > > > D'oh ... I was going to say that I didn't think taht was > > > possible, but, it just might be ... seems I have a section > > > declared twice (note that someone else wrote this originally, > > > I've only just begun to understand it to modify it), so the > > > second section is overriding the first, but I was only ever > > > seeing the first ... > > > > Huh? You've lost me there... > > > > > Let me play with this over the weekend, I'll do a 'small > > > sample set' that you can look at the messages in, and we can > > > go from there ... > > > > Ok. If you can do it in a directory away from the archives themselves > > then I can play if need be without breaking anything by accident... > > > > /D > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your > > joining column's datatypes do not match > > > > Regards, > Oleg > _____________________________________________________________ > Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, > Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) > Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ > phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83 > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664