Re: Postgresql.org search engine. - Mailing list pgsql-www
From | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Postgresql.org search engine. |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20040131014522.O29077@ganymede.hub.org Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Postgresql.org search engine. (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>) |
List | pgsql-www |
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > Hmm, > what's about > > <meta name="robots" content="noindex,follow"> k, that would be for the index/thread pages, of course ... right? here's a question, since you have more experience with this then I ... teh current meta tags set for the message pages themselves are: <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="all"> <META NAME="MSSmartTagsPreventParsing" content="TRUE"> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <META NAME="keywords" content="postgresql, hackers, general, sql, admin, novice, interfaces, odbc, jdbc"> <META NAME="rating" Content="General" > <META NAME="distribution" Content="Global" > <META NAME="revisit-after" Content="7 days" > <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="follow, index, noarchive"> anything wrong with the above? seems okay to me, just making sure that maybe there isn't something else that I should add? > > Oleg > On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Dave Page wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Oleg Bartunov [mailto:oleg@sai.msu.su] > > > > Sent: 30 January 2004 20:01 > > > > To: Dave Page > > > > Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org > > > > Subject: RE: [pgsql-www] Postgresql.org search engine. > > > > > > > > > > > > Why not have fully dynamic pages for mailing lists ? Proper > > > > configured server with cacheing could be very fast. > > > > > > Dunno, the lists and archives are traditionally Marc's domain :-) The > > > changes I'd like to see do involve stripping out the individual messages > > > to the absolute bare minimum of content. > > > > 'k, this is how the search engines should see each message when they > > index: > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-01/msg00745t.php > > > > anything else you'd like me to strip out of there? :( > > > > Note that this is not with the <!--noindex--> stuff you were talking > > about, which, from what you've said, I'm not sure is useful, since not all > > search engines will recognize it ... with the way its coded now, as long > > as I have the search engine listed, the output will look the same ... > > > > ---- > > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) > > Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html > > > > Regards, > Oleg > _____________________________________________________________ > Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, > Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) > Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ > phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83 > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664