Re: pl/pgSQL versus pl/Python - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From James William Pye
Subject Re: pl/pgSQL versus pl/Python
Date
Msg-id 20040127233533.GG78018@void.ph.cox.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to pl/pgSQL versus pl/Python  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 01/27/04:04/2, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> With the new preload option is there any benefit/drawback to using 
> pl/Python versus
> pl/pgSQL? And no... I don't care that pl/Python is now considered 
> untrusted.
Feature-wise I'm not exactly sure how pl/Python matches up against pl/pgSQL, but I'd bet on pl/pgSQL being more mature,
aspl/Python was rather rough the last time I looked at its source(7.3.x).
 
No docs yet, and parts are immature as well, but if you're not afraid of playing with some dirty source, you can
checkoutmy Python PL project on gborg.Once I get it cleaned up and throw in a few more implementation details(oh yes,
thefun ones =\), I'll make a more formal announcement on hackers to get some criticisms and pointers before a formal
release.(Iannounced intent about 3-4 months ago and have been working on it infrequently since then.)
 

gborg.postgresql.org/project/postgrespy
(use cvs, co the modules pl and if)
If you are in no particular hurry, I would suggest waiting until this is done(may be a while still). It should be quite
animprovement to pl/Python in many aspects.
 

Regards,       James William Pye


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Question about indexes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Write cache