On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 02:09:02AM +0100, NTPT wrote:
> And why in POSTGRESQL there is not just an appropriate DATATYPE for creating a column type touch_timestamp in
table (I suggest touch_timestamp to be the same in one transaction... ) ?
> I thing that it might be useful (and add no overhead) for lot of tasks ......
It would have overhead but why not just use a trigger which is the supported
and far more flexible way of doing this?
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> (... have gone from d-i being barely usable even by its developers
> anywhere, to being about 20% done. Sweet. And the last 80% usually takes
> 20% of the time, too, right?) -- Anthony Towns, debian-devel-announce
