On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 10:18:35AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> Not I. We have had issues with JFS and data corruption on a powerout but
> XFS has been rock solid in all of our tests.
Sorry, it was Josh Berkus:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2004-01/msg00086.php
> There is nothing else on Linux that comes close to that. Plus XFS has been
> proven in a 64 bit environment (Irix).
I had lots of happy experiences with XFS when administering IRIX
boxes[1], but I don't know what differences the Linux port entailed.
Do you have details on that? We're certainly looking for an option
over JFS at the moment.
A
[1] I will note, however, that it was practically the only happy
experience I had with them. IRIX made the early Debian installer
look positively user-friendly, and SGI's desire to make everything
whiz-bang nifty by running practically every binary setuid root gave
me fits. But XFS was nice.
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant-
garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism.
--Brad Holland
