Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question
Date
Msg-id 200401230454.i0N4sY101164@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question  ("Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Tom Lane said:
> >
> > Actually, I was expecting you to complain that the s_lock.h coding is
> > gcc-specific.  Which compilers do we need to support on Windows?
> >
> 
> AFAIK the only target build environment for Windows right now is MinGW/gcc
> 
> If anyone knows how to get the M$ compilers to work nicely with our build
> system that might be interesting, but probably at a later stage.

MS C compiler usage would require gmake and a whole host of other stuff
that doesn't seem worth doing.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Permissions and PGSQL
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question