Re: Brokenness in parsing of pg_hba.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kurt Roeckx
Subject Re: Brokenness in parsing of pg_hba.conf
Date
Msg-id 20040107192845.GA25294@ping.be
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Brokenness in parsing of pg_hba.conf  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Brokenness in parsing of pg_hba.conf
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 01:58:54PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> 
> >    [IP6] [Option Start] If the specified address family is AF_INET6 or
> >    AF_UNSPEC, standard IPv6 text forms described in inet_ntop() are
> >    valid. [Option End]

> I read it to mean that abbreviated forms (via inet_addr()) are OK for 
> AF_INET but not for AF_INET6 (via inet_pton())

I guess I missed that that section is only about IPv6.  So it
should use inet_addr()'s behaviour.


Kurt



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kurt Roeckx
Date:
Subject: Re: Brokenness in parsing of pg_hba.conf
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Brokenness in parsing of pg_hba.conf