Re: -fpic vs. -fPIC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: -fpic vs. -fPIC
Date
Msg-id 200311291812.hATICwu09572@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: -fpic vs. -fPIC  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: -fpic vs. -fPIC  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Lamar Owen <lowen@pari.edu> writes:
> > The project lead for the Aurora SPARC Linux project is who recommended it in 
> > the first place;
> 
> We were told equally positively, by equally well-informed persons, that
> we should prefer -fpic if at all possible.
> 
> The best I have been able to tell is that none of our .so's are anywhere
> near large enough to require -fPIC.  In the absence of any evidence that
> we really are near the threshold, I'd prefer to go for the
> better-performing alternative.

One question would be what happens when it fails?  Does it fail visibly
so we would hear about it?  If so, we can take the risk.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: -fpic vs. -fPIC
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: -fpic vs. -fPIC