Re: RPM RH9.0 conflict with unixODBC - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Lamar Owen
Subject Re: RPM RH9.0 conflict with unixODBC
Date
Msg-id 200311251720.53704.lowen@pari.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RPM RH9.0 conflict with unixODBC  (Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 03:38 pm, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> RHAS-2.1:
> tsearch2.so   152888 bytes

> RH9.0:
> tsearch2.so   951236 bytes

FWIW, on Fedora Core:
[lowen@localhost pgsql]$ ls -l tsearch2.so
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root       141348 Nov 21 21:53 tsearch2.so
[lowen@localhost pgsql]$

Something is certainly unusual here.  Sander, can you rebuild the RH9 set and
see why it is so large?  For some reason, I missed how many places were in
there, and missed the fact that there were multiple megabytes difference.
Debugging symbols or no, this is big.

And as Fedora Core uses gcc 3, that doesn't explain it.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC  28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Gaetano Mendola
Date:
Subject: Re: RPM RH9.0 conflict with unixODBC
Next
From: "D. Stimits"
Date:
Subject: performance versus order of fields in row