Re: Release cycle length - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Release cycle length
Date
Msg-id 20031121130359.GE26392@dcc.uchile.cl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Release cycle length  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Responses Re: Release cycle length  (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 09:38:50AM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >Yeah, I think the main issue in all this is that for real production
> >sites, upgrading Postgres across major releases is *painful*.  We have
> >to find a solution to that before it makes sense to speed up the
> >major-release cycle.
> 
> Well, I think one of the simplest is to do a topological sort of objects 
>  in pg_dump (between object classes that need it), AND regression 
> testing for pg_dump :)

One of the most complex would be to avoid the need of pg_dump for
upgrades ...

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[@]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"I call it GNU/Linux. Except the GNU/ is silent." (Ben Reiter)


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: logical column position
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] More detail on settings for pgavd?