On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Based on the below wouldn't they also have to go after Microsoft?
Depends ... does MicroSoft use BSD TCP/IP, or did they write their own? I
know that Linux is not using BSD TCP/IP (or, at least, they didn't in
their first 3 incarnations of the stack) ...
>
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >><troll>Of course, now that SCO is claiming ownership of BSD code .....
> >></troll>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Interesting thread that ... last I read on the FreeBSD lists was
> >speculation that they would be going after ppl like Cisco (re: TCP/IP
> >Networking Code) since there really is nobody else large enough to bother
> >with ... its going to be interesting to see :)
> >
> >----
> >Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> >Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
> >
> >
> >---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> >TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> > joining column's datatypes do not match
> >
> >
>
> --
> Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
> Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
> +1-503-222-2783 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
> Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - http://www.postgresql.org
>
>
>
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
