On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 10:47:22AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> > >Whoa! You mean these aren't already separate database clusters or
> > >even separate systems? I am very shocked, you can't do a proper Dev
> > >--> QAT --> Prod environment if all three systems are run by the same
> > >postmaster, or on the same host imo. But maybe I'm just over
> > >cautious, or worked on systems where access to production systems is
> > >controlled.
> >
> > I second this. Use different databases for each. You can run them
> > on the same machine (there are some real advantages to this) but
> > create a separate initdb for each...
>
> What's the point? You can keep them separate through pg_hba.conf if
> it's really needed. I don't see how having several clusters, one
> database each, buys you any security.
I don't think security isn't the issue but instead it's reliability. If
you have a bug in your dev system that say causes backends to die and
forcing full postmaster restarts, do you really want to be mucking up your
production system as well? This isn't hard to imagine if you have
extension functions that you're loading as part of your dev system that
are different from production.
