Dear Ron,
> If pgadmin does not work with an unpatched 2.6 then you are going to
> be in a world of pain wrt to distributing it in Debian (and probably
> the other distros too, though I can't speak for them).
Of course. Please note that we never intended to get our patched version into
Debian.
> My best recommendation would be that you get an idea (from wx-dev)
> of when people would like to see 2.6 frozen (the borland thing will
> surely be pushing this in ways the code alone might not mandate)
> and then work very hard to see that all your important patches are
> incorporated in one way or another before then.
Borland is a company. PostgreSQL is a community. I hope you prefer PostgreSQL
to Borland. Therefore, 2.6 cannot be frozen before it incorporates Andreas
Pflug patches, which will probably be the case sooner or later.
> The bottom line basically is that either you guys will need to fork
> wx entirely and support your own version, or work to merge your
> branch with the mainstream before the stable release is made.
We do not intend to fork wx and never will.
> Sorry, but as much as I'd love to help you guys get your app into
> the next Debian stable release, I just can't make the .debs a
> leverage point for patches that haven't been accepted into cvs yet.
> If you want them in the 2.6 debs, you're going to have to get them
> past the gauntlet of wx-dev first.
Let's wait for wxWindows to manage Unicode and aother issues. All patches are
available for inclusion into wx main branch:
http://snake.pgadmin.org/snapshots/wxwindows/patches/
The goal of Debian is to be a world distribution. We all have the same goals:
proper Unicode management, working Cut/Paste, etc... For example, work is
being done by the wx team on RTL better support. Everyone is working in the
same direction, there is no idea of a "fork" and we never intended so.
But, only one thing : please, publish wx26, poEdit and pgAdmin3 in Debian at
the same time. Everyone will benefit from it.
Best regards,
Jean-Michel
