Re: vacuum locking - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: vacuum locking
Date
Msg-id 20031023101425.GC16878@libertyrms.info
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: vacuum locking  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: vacuum locking
List pgsql-performance
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 09:27:47PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> trace.  What is causing that?  Not VACUUM I don't think.  It doesn't have
> any huge memory demand.  But swapping out processes could account for

What about if you've set vacuum_mem too high?

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan                         204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada                        Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info>                              M2P 2A8
                                         +1 416 646 3304 x110


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Alexander Priem"
Date:
Subject: RedHat Enterprise Linux ES 3 ?!?!
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum locking