Re: Last beta ... we hope? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andreas Joseph Krogh
Subject Re: Last beta ... we hope?
Date
Msg-id 200310221743.01845.andreak@officenet.no
Whole thread Raw
In response to Last beta ... we hope?  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: Last beta ... we hope?  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Re: Last beta ... we hope?  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 22 October 2003 16:21, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> 'K, I packaged it up last night so that the ftp mirrors could get up to
> date on it ... I'm going to put out an announce to -general and -announce
> on this later this evening, but if someone wants to take a quick scan of
> the tar ball to make sure that it all looks okay to them, that would be
> great ...

So, is an initdb from beta4 required or not?

- --
Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak@officenet.no>
Managing Director, Senior Software Developer
OfficeNet AS

- - Writing software is more fun than working.

gpg public_key: http://dev.officenet.no/~andreak/public_key.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/lqWFUopImDh2gfQRArKoAJwPMmF1fE2NiTQX4yKNQuCH+5NokACggzOO
V8w4FFh0Tbvqcce3mLUDZx4=
=B+bj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: integer ceiling in LIMIT and OFFSET
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Last beta ... we hope?