... - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andrew Overholt
Subject ...
Date
Msg-id 20031022130220.GA26133@redhat.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [PORTS] Redhat RPMs  (Andrew Overholt <overholt@redhat.com>)
List pgsql-general
djee
Bcc:
Subject: Re: [PORTS] [GENERAL] Redhat RPMs
Reply-To: Andrew Overholt <overholt@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <200310141315.18492.lowen@pari.edu>

Lamar Owen once said:
> On Friday 10 October 2003 08:52 pm, Christopher Browne wrote:
> > Oops! nandrews@investsystems.co.uk ("Nigel J. Andrews") was seen
> spray-painting on a wall:
> > > I've not looked at many RPMs but I must say that the few I have have
> > > never been relocatable. Can the postgresql RPMs not be made
> > > relocatable?

I tried this once but had many issues with initdb and a few others IIRC.
The locations of data directories and such was being hard-coded in them at
compile time and I had to do a lot of sed-ing in the specfile to make it
work.  I know I accomplished that but ended up hitting a wall with
something ... I'll look in my old mail to remind myself what it was.

> It wasn't at that time implemented due to political factors (read: the then
> Red Hat maintainer (@redhat.com) refused to include such support even if I

I don't think that applies anymore :)  David Jee is the current maintainer
and I'm sure that he'd be open to such suggestions.  I've CC'd him.

Andrew

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Peter Childs
Date:
Subject: Trigger
Next
From: Pedro Alves
Date:
Subject: Re: Same conditions, different planning?