Re: 2-phase commit - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeroen T. Vermeulen
Subject Re: 2-phase commit
Date
Msg-id 20031011123624.GA97612@xs4all.nl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 2-phase commit  ("Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 09:37:53PM -0700, Dann Corbit wrote:
> Why not apply the effort to something already done and compatibly
> licensed?
> 
> This:
> http://dog.intalio.com/ots.html
> 
> Appears to be a Berkeley style licensed:
> http://dog.intalio.com/license.html
> 
> Transaction monitor.

I'd say this is complementary, not an alternative to 2PC implementation
issues.  

The transaction monitor lives on the other side of the problem.  2PC is
needed in the database _so that_ the transaction monitor can do its job.

That said, having a 3-tier model is probably a good idea if distributed
transaction management is what we want.  :-)


Jeroen



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gavin Sherry
Date:
Subject: Re: performance difference between pgsql and SQL
Next
From: "Andrew Dunstan"
Date:
Subject: Re: compile warning