> Yes. I don't think that 2PC is a solution for robustness in face of
> network failure. It's too slow, to begin with. Some sort of
> multi-master system is very desirable for network failures, &c., but
> I don't think anybody does active/hot standby with 2PC any more; the
> performance is too bad.
I'm tired of this kind of "2PC is too slow" arguments. I think
Satoshi, the only guy who made a trial implementation of 2PC for
PostgreSQL, has already showed that 2PC is not that slow.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
