Re: 2-phase commit - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: 2-phase commit
Date
Msg-id 20031009160718.GC14394@libertyrms.info
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 2-phase commit  (Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>)
Responses Re: 2-phase commit
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:22:05AM -0400, Mike Mascari wrote:
> The implementation choosen depends upon the answer, does it not? Is
> there an implementation (e.g. 3PC) that can simulate 2PC behavior for
> interoperability purposes and satisfy both requirements?

I don't know.  What I know is that someone showed up working on 2PC,
and got a frosty reception.  I'm trying to learn what criteria would
make the work acceptable.  For my purposes, the feature would be
really nice, so I'd hate to see the opportunity lost.  If someone has
an idea even how 3PC might be implemented, I'd be happy to hear it.

A

-- 
----
Andrew Sullivan                         204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada                        Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info>                              M2P 2A8                                        +1 416 646 3304
x110



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: 2-phase commit
Next
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Foreign key plan caching (too long!)