Re: 2-phase commit - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: 2-phase commit
Date
Msg-id 20031009135742.GA14048@libertyrms.info
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 2-phase commit  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: 2-phase commit
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 05:43:49PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> OK, I think we came to the conclusion that we want 2-phase commit, but
> want some way to mark a server as offline/read-only, or notify an

That sounds to me like the concusion, to the extent there was one,
yes.  I'd still like to hear from those who continue to have strong
objections on the grounds of the impossibility of a guaranteed
recovery method.  Does the proposal of allowing dbas to run that
risk, provided there's a mechanism to tell them about it, satisfy the
objection (assuming, of course, 2PC can be turned off)?

A

-- 
----
Andrew Sullivan                         204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada                        Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info>                              M2P 2A8                                        +1 416 646 3304
x110



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: _GNU_SOURCE
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: 2-phase commit