Re: Disabling function validation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Disabling function validation
Date
Msg-id 200310081457.h98EvVV24808@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Disabling function validation  ("Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> >Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >  
> >
> >>Should we add a variable that is set from the dump filew that identifies
> >>the version of PostgreSQL that generated the dump?
> >>    SET dumped_version = 7.3
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Is that identifying the backend version, or the pg_dump version?
> >
> >Without a solid rationale for this, I'd rather not do it.
> >
> >  
> >
> Why not both?  I would also think this info could be used in pg_restore 
> in some way at some point.  Even if if can't, wouldn't it be worth it 
> just for debugging purposes.  Knowing for sure what the backend and 
> pg_dump versions were could be helpful.

My guess was that this information would allow us to change the behavior
of PostgreSQL in the future but allow older dumps to still load.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Cannot dump/restore text value \N
Next
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: IDE Drives and fsync