Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
Date
Msg-id 200310081049.55816.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
List pgsql-performance
Bruce,

> Agreed.  Text added to install docs:
>
>    <para>
>     By default, <productname>PostgreSQL</> is configured to run on minimal
>     hardware.  This allows it to start up with almost any hardware
>     configuration. However, the default configuration is not designed for
>     optimum performance. To achieve optimum performance, several server
>     variables must be adjusted, the two most common being
>     <varname>shared_buffers</varname> and <varname> sort_mem</varname>
>     mentioned in <![%standalone-include[the documentation]]>
>     <![%standalone-ignore[<xref
> linkend="runtime-config-resource-memory">]]>. Other parameters in
> <![%standalone-include[the documentation]]> <![%standalone-ignore[<xref
> linkend="runtime-config-resource">]]> also affect performance.
>    </para>

What would you think of adding a condensed version of my and Shridhar's guide
to the install docs?  I think I can offer a 3-paragraph version which would
cover the major points of setting PostgreSQL.conf.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Sun performance - Major discovery!
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL