Re: 2-phase commit - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: 2-phase commit
Date
Msg-id 20030929005440.Y632@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 2-phase commit  (Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:

> The simplest senario(though there could be varations) is
>
> [At participant(master)'s side]
>   Because the commit operations is done, does nothing.
>
> [At coordinator(slave)' side]
>    1) After a while
>    2) re-establish the communication path between the
>       partcipant(master)'s TM.
>    3) resend the "commit requeset" to the participant's TM.
>   1)2)3) would be repeated until the coordinator receives
>   the "commit ok" message from the partcipant.
>
> If there's no objection from you, I would assume I'm right.

'K, but what happens if the slave never gets a 'commit ok'?  Does the
slave keep trying ad nausem?


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta)