> I think there should be just one "duration: nnn" log entry, printed if
> either condition holds.
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> > I also don't particularly like the format of the log message (for one
> > thing, the "duration_statement" prefix in the log message shouldn't
> > include an underscore, it's not a variable or anything -- and the case
> > can be made that if we printed the duration because log_duration is set,
> > we don't need to print it again if the duration of the query exceeded
> > log_min_duration_statement), but I haven't changed it.
>
> I think there should be just one "duration: nnn" log entry, printed if
> either condition holds.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
