-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 16:25, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> >Hi.
> >
> >I'm trying to implement functionallity to dump multiple tables with
> > multiple "-t <table-name>" options.
>
> excellent.
>
> >While digging in the source for pg_dump I see that
> >many local static variables are not freed( with free(3)). Is this lazy
> >programming because pg_dump is its own process where the kernel takes
> > care of cleaning up, so you don't bother to do it for some of the
> > variables? I'm malloc'ing some structs to build a list over tables which
> > are marked for dumping. Shall I bother to free(3) them?
>
> I don't think it's lazy, probably just a product of the programmer's
> awareness that little would be gained by it. Relying on the OS to clean
> up for you is perfectly valid in a shortlived program unless you get a
> major problem with memory leaks.
I didn't mean lazy as in bad - I ment lazy as in just what you pointed out:
little would be gained by it, so why bother.
> "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" would be my take.
>
> (If this is not the consensus I'm going to have some more work to do in
> the C port of initdb I'm working on, which is about one third done :-)
:-)
- --
Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak@officenet.no>
Managing Director, Senior Software Developer
OfficeNet AS
- - Writing software is more fun than working.
gpg public_key: http://dev.officenet.no/~andreak/public_key.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/cF3DUopImDh2gfQRAtR4AJ499CK4QcGO9Dc0Wato46/wZMxZ/wCaApSP
463Z/DfsEBtUvQ50h/osKAc=
=eEqD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
