On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 06:36:47PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Robert Treat writes:
>
> > Hmm... the counter state seems to be that now these commands would tell you
> > they are doing something even though they are arn't really doing anything:
>
> Commands are defined in terms of their results, not in terms of their
> actions, and certainly not in terms of the amount of grinding that is
> caused by them.
This argument makes sense. At least it convinced me.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"La fuerza no está en los medios físicos
sino que reside en una voluntad indomable" (Gandhi)
